This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch to resort builtins

From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 10:59:34 -0700
Subject: Re: Patch to resort builtins
References: <200308011413.KAA21954@caip.rutgers.edu><87oez91en5.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><200308011739.NAA25604@caip.rutgers.edu>

"Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:

>  > It occurs to me that _Exit is in the implementation namespace, so
>  > technically it was reserved by C90.  This has nothing to do with your
>  > patch, I just noticed it while looking through the file.
>
> DEF_C99_C90RES_BUILTIN ?

I'd say so.  The effect, I believe, is that a call to _Exit in the
user's code will be recognized as noreturn even in -std=c90 mode,
which I think is the right thing.

zw

References:
- Patch to resort builtins
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: Patch to resort builtins
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Patch to resort builtins
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]