This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch to add declarations for many (most?) math builtins
> From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>
> > (BUILT_IN_CBRT, BUILT_IN_HYPOT, BUILT_IN_LDEXP, BUILT_IN_SINH,
> > BUILT_IN_COSH, BUILT_IN_ASINH, BUILT_IN_ACOSH, BUILT_IN_ASIN,
> > BUILT_IN_ACOS, BUILT_IN_LOG10, BUILT_IN_TANH, BUILT_IN_ATANH,
> > BUILT_IN_CBRTF, BUILT_IN_HYPOTF, BUILT_IN_LDEXPF, BUILT_IN_SINHF,
> > BUILT_IN_COSHF, BUILT_IN_ASINHF, BUILT_IN_ACOSHF, BUILT_IN_ASINF,
> > BUILT_IN_ACOSF, BUILT_IN_LOG10F, BUILT_IN_TANHF, BUILT_IN_ATANHF,
> > BUILT_IN_CBRTL, BUILT_IN_HYPOTL, BUILT_IN_LDEXPL, BUILT_IN_SINHL,
> > BUILT_IN_COSHL, BUILT_IN_ASINHL, BUILT_IN_ACOSHL, BUILT_IN_ASINL,
> > BUILT_IN_ACOSL, BUILT_IN_LOG10L, BUILT_IN_TANHL, BUILT_IN_ATANHL):
> > New builtins.
>
> All built-in functions should be documented in extend.texi.
Yes Joseph, thank you for your reply. You are of course correct and I
will post a followup.
I am also interested in your opinion regarding the DEF_* issue I
raised in my original posting. I think as C frontend maintainer you
are in a unique position to comment on that.
Thanks,
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu