This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch/i386]: -mrtd vs system library declarations

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Danny Smith <danny_r_smith_2001 at yahoo dot co dot nz>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:18:39 -0700
Subject: Re: [Patch/i386]: -mrtd vs system library declarations
References: <m3ispuplgo.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <20030723092908.87930.qmail@web21410.mail.yahoo.com>

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 07:29:08PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> For both mechanisms it still means that system headers (like libstdc++'s)
> will still need things like [...] to protect against -mrtd.
> I was hoping to avoid that.

No, sorry.  This is one of those compiler flags that change the ABI.
Which, in general, just shouldn't be used, ever.

r~

References:
- Re: [Patch/i386]: -mrtd vs system library declarations
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [Patch/i386]: -mrtd vs system library declarations
  - From: Danny Smith

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]