This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[tree-ssa] Minor testsuite update


Something I noticed while wrapping up the code to copy propagate values
into virtual operands.  We currently fail this test, but will pass when
I check-in the code to copy propagate values into virtual operands.


        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030711-2.c: There should only be one load
        of rtmem after rewriting into SSA form.

Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030711-2.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/Attic/20030711-2.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.2.1
diff -c -3 -p -r1.1.2.1 20030711-2.c
*** gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030711-2.c	15 Jul 2003 19:24:51 -0000	1.1.2.1
--- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030711-2.c	29 Jul 2003 13:47:47 -0000
*************** get_alias_set (t)
*** 59,66 ****
  /* There should be one load of code.  */
  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "code" 1 "ssa"} } */
  
! /* There should be two loads of rtmem.  */
! /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "rtmem" 2 "ssa"} } */
  
  /* There should be one load of alias.  */
  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "->alias" 1 "ssa"} } */
--- 59,66 ----
  /* There should be one load of code.  */
  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "code" 1 "ssa"} } */
  
! /* There should be one load of rtmem.  */
! /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "rtmem" 1 "ssa"} } */
  
  /* There should be one load of alias.  */
  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "->alias" 1 "ssa"} } */



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]