This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [Java PATCH] An attempt at removing a "Gross hack"
- From: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, "'java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'Zack Weinberg '" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:22:52 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: RE: [Java PATCH] An attempt at removing a "Gross hack"
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > So it should be feasible for 3.4... Maybe you can open a bug
> > for this to track the issue, and make 7257 depend on it?
>
> I suppose it might be worth back porting functions as trees to
> mainline, but it wouldn't be trivial.
I can believe it.
> If needs be we can diable the RTL inliner when compiling Java. I
> don't think this is a huge bug deal.
Sounds like a good plan. The rtl inliner never did much for Java anyway.
Anyway, I've created PR 11629 to track the issue.
Jeff