This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: peeling more bits off the onion


"Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:

| Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> writes:
| 
| >> poplevel is called from language independent code (bleah) so, no, not
| >> without changing every front end.  Which might be a good idea but is
| >> out of my ambit right now.
| >
| > At least, could we use an enum for this, even if the parameter can't
| > be the enum right now?
| 
| I suppose so.  I'll include that in a future piece of this work.

Last time I was working one this sort of thing, Mark, Jason and I
agreed it is ugly and wrong that poplevel() is being called from
there (by language independent code).  We agree that should not
happen.  so instead of preserving that hack, I would rather we get rid
of it. 

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]