Re: another baby step - namespace adjustments

[Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>]

> > It's not that it's not portable enough, it's that jumping through the
> > necessary hoops to link cc1 against libm.so when and only when this is
> > required is too much trouble.
> 
> I fully understand the reasons why you're using that function.  But
> I'm looking at it from libiberty's point of view.  This function
> doesn't meet the criteria most libiberty functions do:

What if it just gets moved into its own gcc/sqrt_approx.c file?  Would that
fulfill the original goals?

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams