This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Final intermodule patch


> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
> 
> > Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com> writes:
> > 
> > > On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 03:36 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >> Can you expand a bit on how usable this is yet?
> > >
> > > Should be fairly usable, though, it hasn't seen tons of use.  It does
> > > all of SPEC (well, except eon) for example, just to give you a flavor
> > > of what has already been though it.
> > 
> > Do you have any SPEC numbers that you can share?  How much improvement
> > does it bring?
> 
> If you just use this patch, you get a decrease in SPEC performance,
> because GCC's current inlining heuristics don't work very well in that
> situation.  With improved heuristics (Dale's and Stuart's work), we
> got significant improvement instead of a decrease.

What kind of improvements have you implemented?  How does it relate to
the new inlining heuristics code I commited last week?

Honza
> 
> (I won't quote numbers because some of them might be confidential, and
> they won't be reproducible on any system you have now anyway.)
> 
> -- 
> - Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]