This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] RFC: Fix GCSE bug optimization/11440 (3.3 regression)
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Roger Sayle <roger at www dot eyesopen dot com>
- Date: 13 Jul 2003 13:14:22 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: Fix GCSE bug optimization/11440 (3.3 regression)
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <200307112335.03652@enzo.bigblue.local> <200307132057.04001@enzo.bigblue.local>
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 11:57, Franz Sirl wrote:
> On Friday 11 July 2003 23:35, Franz Sirl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch against the 3_3-branch fixes the testcase for me (no completed
> > bootstrap/regtest so far). I'm not 100% sure if it's the right place to
> > reject the note, but it looks reasonable to me. And do I need to reject
> > STRICT_LOW_PART and SUBREG too?
> >
> > Franz.
> >
> > * gcse.c (try_replace_reg): Don't attach notes to ZERO_EXTRACT or
> > SIGN_EXTRACT SETs.
>
> Passed boostrap and regtest on ppc-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu.
>
> Mark, initially I've scheduled the bugfix for 3.3.2, but if the fix stays that
> simple, fixing it in 3.3.1 might be advisable.
Indeed. Please keep me apprised. If a patch seems like its probably
ready, attach it to the PR and send me email to ask for a review,
please!
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
CodeSourcery, LLC