This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [wwwdocs] Mention cgraph stuff in news/changes?
- From: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, <jh at suse dot cz>, <aph at redhat dot com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 15:12:22 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Mention cgraph stuff in news/changes?
On 13 Jul 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Any plans to implement it or shall I correct this in the Changes page?
I don't know of any plans, though I'd love to see something done for 3.4.
Inlining in gcj has never really worked that well in part because it could
not inline out-of-order methods (and there is a long-standing PR for
this).
Gcj has been compiling class-at-a-time for a some time now, so the call
graph would be useful with or without unit-at-a-time. (In fact many
Java sources contain only one class, in which case unit-at-a-time would
make no practical difference.) I haven't yet looked at the cgraph
interface to see how it might be done.
I'm copying Andrew Haley since he is the one most familiar with Java
inlining.
Jeff