This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [top level] autoconfiscate INSTALL usage
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 02:09:36 -0400
- Subject: Re: [top level] autoconfiscate INSTALL usage
- References: <20030712232703.GA670@doctormoo>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 07:27:03PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Look, it's great that y'all are discussing the many other problems with
> the way INSTALL is handled, but can I get this one approved and
> committed? It doesn't affect the other problems one way or the other.
I thought you were a top-level-directory maintainter?
*looks*
Oh. SC, why isn't he a top-level-directory maintainer yet?
FWIW, having tossed around autoconf for a while now, it seems to be an
obviously correct patch, but I'm not a top-level maintainer either. :-)
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams