This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, mbp at sourcefrog dot net, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>, distcc at lists dot samba dot org, Thomas Walker <Thomas dot Walker at morganstanley dot com>, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:45:13 -0700
Subject: Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc

On Sunday, July 6, 2003, at 03:26 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

On Jul 6, 2003, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:

BTW, I may have found out why the differences in macro line numbers
were gone: distcc assumes -Mpwd requires local execution, so it never
ran separate preprocessing and remote compilation.  Oops.


Confirmed, the problem is still there.  The trick to get distcc to
distribute compilations and use -Mpwd is to add -Wp,-Mpwd to
BOOT_CFLAGS.

In my version, I default -Mpwd to on, well, to be correct, I don't have such a flag, I always do it. I think the flag should default to on.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]