This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/11420 (broken amd64 movabs*) (take 2)

On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:18:23PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> +  mem = SET_SRC (set);
> +  while (GET_CODE (mem) == SUBREG)
> +    mem = SUBREG_REG (mem);
> +  if (GET_CODE (mem) != MEM || XEXP (mem, 0) != op)
> +    {
> +      mem = SET_DEST (set);
> +      while (GET_CODE (mem) == SUBREG)
> +	mem = SUBREG_REG (mem);
> +      if (GET_CODE (mem) != MEM || XEXP (mem, 0) != op)
> +	abort ();

What is the logic behind doing it this way with op an rtx
instead of passing in an operand number and doing

  mem = XEXP (set, opnum);
  if (GET_CODE (mem) != MEM)
    abort ();

and so forth?



r~
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]