This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix: Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on2003-07-06T23:56:04Z.


Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:

> Looks like it was Mark's patch introduced a warning:
>
> +2003-07-06  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
> +
> +	PR c++/11345
> +	* search.c (lookup_base_r): Remove is_non_public and
> +	within_current_scope parameters.  Remove other dead code.
> +	(lookup_base): Adjust call to lookup_base_r.
> +	(adjust_result_of_qualified_name_lookup): Improve comment.
> +	* semantics.c (finish_call_expr): Use maybe_dummy_object.
>
> ChageLog:
> 2003-07-06  Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
>
> 	* search.c (dynamic_cast_base_recurse): Remove unused variable.
>
> Patch:
> Index: search.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/search.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.270
> diff -u -p -r1.270 search.c
> --- search.c	6 Jul 2003 23:23:45 -0000	1.270
> +++ search.c	7 Jul 2003 01:43:59 -0000
> @@ -364,7 +364,6 @@ dynamic_cast_base_recurse (tree subtype,
>     for (i = 0; i < n_baselinks; i++)
>       {
>         tree base_binfo = TREE_VEC_ELT (binfos, i);
> -      tree base_access = TREE_VEC_ELT (accesses, i);
>         int rval;
>
>         if (base_access != access_public_node)

This is the wrong patch, base_access is used three lines further down.

The warning is about base_access in line 199, I'll test this now,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]