This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: `pending_bincls' defined but not used


David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:

|> 	Your patch just covered up the problem and created more errors: 
|> dbxout.c is use for more than just DBX_DEBUGGING_INFO.  I have committed
|> the following patch.

Unfortunately, this is still not good enough.  DBX_USE_BINCLS may be
defined even if neither DBX_DEBUGGING_INFO nor XCOFF_DEBUGGING_INFO are
defined.

2003-07-03  Andreas Schwab  <schwab@suse.de>

	* dbxout.c (pending_bincls): Move decl down inside
	DBX_DEBUGGING_INFO || XCOFF_DEBUGGING_INFO section.

--- gcc/dbxout.c.~1.151.~	2003-07-03 11:33:54.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/dbxout.c	2003-07-03 11:37:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -195,11 +195,6 @@ struct dbx_file GTY(())
   struct dbx_file *prev;              /* Chain to traverse all pending bincls.  */
 };
 
-#ifdef DBX_USE_BINCL
-/* If zero then there is no pending BINCL.  */
-static int pending_bincls = 0;
-#endif
-
 /* This is the top of the stack.  */
 
 static GTY(()) struct dbx_file *current_file;
@@ -241,6 +236,11 @@ static GTY(()) int lastfile_is_base;
 
 #if defined (DBX_DEBUGGING_INFO) || defined (XCOFF_DEBUGGING_INFO)
 
+#ifdef DBX_USE_BINCL
+/* If zero then there is no pending BINCL.  */
+static int pending_bincls = 0;
+#endif
+
 /* The original input file name.  */
 static const char *base_input_file;
 

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]