Re: [jh@suse.cz: Re: 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-06-24T13:15:02Z.]

[Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>]

On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 02:30:06PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> 	* Makefile.in (GTFILES): Add cgraph.h.
> 	* cgraph.c (known_decls): Remove.
> 	(cgraph_hash, cgraph_nodes, cgraph_nodes_queue,
> 	cgraph_varpool_hash, cgraph_varpool_nodes_queue): GTYize.
> 	(cgraph_node): Do not allocate known_decls; use polutate hashtable.
> 	(cgraph_varpool_node): Likewise; add next pointer.
> 	(cgraph_varpool_nodes): New static variable.
> 	* cgraph.h (cgraph_local_info, cgraph_global_info, cgraph_rtl_info,
> 	cgraph_node, cgraph_edge, cgraph_varpool_node, cgraph_nodes, cgraph_n_nodes,
> 	cgraph_varpool_n_nodes, cgraph_varpool_nodes_queue): GTYize.
> 	* gengtype.c (open_base_files): Include cgraph.h

Ok.

>     slot =
>       (struct cgraph_node **) htab_find_slot_with_hash (cgraph_hash,
>   						      DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (decl),
> ! 						      IDENTIFIER_HASH_VALUE
>   						      (DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
>   						       (decl)), 1);

Better wrapped as


  slot = (struct cgraph_node **)
    htab_find_slot_with_hash (cgraph_hash, DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (decl),
                              IDENTIFIER_HASH_VALUE (DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (decl)),
                              1);



r~