Re: Unreviewed patches

[Jim Wilson <wilson at tuliptree dot org>]

Kazu Hirata wrote:
> [patch] reload1.c: Move reload_cse_reg and its friends to postreload.c.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg01850.html

OK.

> [patch] reload1.c: A very tiny speedup.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg02224.html

OK.

> [patch] execute/simd-4.c: Enable only when sizeof(int) == 4.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg02298.html

Adding all of that preprocessor stuff doesn't seem like a good solution. 
 Isn't there any other way to solve the problem, like adding sizeof 
tests?  I will defer on this for now.

The message doesn't make it clear why the test fails, and hence doesn't 
make it clear why we can't use something simpler like a sizeof test.

> [patch] avr: Remove -mrtl.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg02384.html

OK.

> [patch] expr.c: Fix the failure of gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-4.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg02553.html
>
> [patch] jump.c: Remove an unused function.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg02595.html
>
> [patch] explow.c: Remove an unused function, find_next_ref().
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg02614.html

I haven't gotten this far in my backlog yet.  These were all posted in 
the last 4 days, so I will defer them for now.

Jim