This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: bugs.html

Could anyone please advise me on the following?  Is the patch okay?

(And how about that section of bugs.html considering recent changes
to GCC?)


On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Nathan, what do you think about the patch below?
> If you prefer a variation thereof, please go ahead and commit an
> updated patch or let me know what changes you'd like to see.
> (And in general, would you mind having a look at that section of
> bugs.html which, IIRC, was contributed by you?)
> Gerald
> Index: bugs.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.70
> diff -u -3 -p -r1.70 bugs.html
> --- bugs.html	4 Jun 2003 14:12:45 -0000	1.70
> +++ bugs.html	6 Jun 2003 18:12:55 -0000
> @@ -487,10 +487,8 @@ in GCC 3.1.
>  <dt>Covariant return types</dt>
> -<dd>We do not implement non-trivial covariant returns. We also generate
> -incorrect virtual function tables for trivial covariance. Although
> -trivial covariance will work, it is incompatible with the ABI. GNATS PR
> -3706 tracks this problem.</dd>
> +<dd>Up to (and including) GCC 3.3 we did not implement non-trivial
> +covariant returns, but this has been addressed for GCC 3.4.</dd>
>  </dl>

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]