This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ PATCH: PR c++/10888

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 23 Jun 2003 07:41:27 -0700
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH: PR c++/10888
References: <200306201933.h5KJXRa8007651@sirius.codesourcery.com> <3EF6BA5E.8070402@codesourcery.com>

On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 01:29, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
> > (I think we should just get rid of -Winline; if you want to know what
> > optimization decisions the compiler made when running your code you
> > want much more detailed output, and -Winline is inherently incredibly
> > fragile.  Tiny changes in the input program can result in substantial
> > differences in the output.)
> 
> It is useful to know
> 	'I can't inline this function that you declared inline, because you
> 	haven't told me what its definition is'

Yeah, that makes sense -- but -Winline has never done that. :-)

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com

References:
- C++ PATCH: PR c++/10888
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: C++ PATCH: PR c++/10888
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]