This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Optimize sprintf(buffer,"foo")

From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 06:44:22 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize sprintf(buffer,"foo")
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306221601070.20426-100000@www.eyesopen.com>

Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com> writes:

> Whilst I was writing this patch I also discovered some mistakes
> in the ways that argument lists are constructed when optimizing
> calls to built-in functions.  These are also fixed by the patch
> below.

Will those result in miscompilation?  ARe these bugs in GCC 3.3 and
need to be backported?  Do you have some testcase for these
situations?

Cheers,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, SuSE Linux AG, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Optimize sprintf(buffer,"foo")
  - From: Roger Sayle

References:
- [PATCH] Optimize sprintf(buffer,"foo")
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]