This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge fix
- From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 20 Jun 2003 15:28:06 -0400
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge fix
- References: <200306201736.h5KHa8Ke006919@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 13:36, law@redhat.com wrote:
> In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306201248340.25569-100000@ops2.one-point.com>, Jeff
> Sturm writes:
> >
> >It's up to you guys, but I'd really, really like to get the gcj stuff in
> >soon so I can stop playing catchup. As the tree stands today (i.e.
> >without Andrew's reverted patch) it won't build.
> I strongly recommend not reverting Andrew's patch. Andrew will be back
> online Monday working regularly and I'm sure he'll give the problem
> prompt attention.
>
The reverted patch outghn't have any effect on anything else.. This
*part* of the patch I offered to revert is purely a structural thing. We
do slightly better code on the switch split.. doesn't affect the sweitch
fallthru code, and doesnt affect the "correctness" of the previous
patch..other than make libjava work :-)
But anyway, If'n you want to wait until monday, thats cool too.
Andrew