Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge fix

[Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>]

On 20 Jun 2003, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> 	* tree-cfg.c (handle_switch_split):  Revert last change.

Merging this with Jeff's handle_switch_split changes from yesterday and
my gcj frontend work, I get:

        === libstdc++-v3 Summary ===

# of expected passes        1853
# of unexpected failures    1
# of unexpected successes   1

        === libmudflap Summary ===

# of expected passes        4
# of unexpected failures    268

        === libjava Summary ===

# of expected passes        3018
# of unexpected failures    1
# of expected failures      16
# of untested testcases     12

        === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes        22430
# of unexpected failures    12
# of unexpected successes   6
# of expected failures      79
# of unresolved testcases   1
# of unsupported tests      101

        === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes        8557
# of unexpected failures    13
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures      68
# of unsupported tests      15

        === objc Summary ===

# of expected passes        1156

        === g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes        1734
# of unexpected failures    1
# of untested testcases     1


Not bad... though I'm suspicious of the g++ failures.  Significantly,
libjava builds with no extra backend hacks.

It's up to you guys, but I'd really, really like to get the gcj stuff in
soon so I can stop playing catchup.  As the tree stands today (i.e.
without Andrew's reverted patch) it won't build.

Jeff