This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, committed] Adjust bugs/management.html
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 02:24:20 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [Patch, committed] Adjust bugs/management.html
- References: <200306190944.07887.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> I think the patch below falls into the "obvious" category, so I committed it.
Sure, thanks!
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs/management.html,v
> ! <p>For reports in components C, C++, and optimization, we require that there
> is
> ! a reduced, small testcase before a report can be put into this state. This
> ! makes sure that all NEW reports are really analyzed and are ready to be
> handed
> ! off to the people actually fixing bugs.</p>
> ! </dd>
Perhaps quote "C", "C++", and "optimization" and "a report" -> "they"?
> ! <tr><th>Critical</th><td>crashes, memory leak and similar problems on code
> that
> ! is written in a common enough style to affect a significant fraction of
> ! users</td></tr>
> ! <tr><th>Normal</th><td>major loss of function </td></tr>
> ! <tr><th>Minor</th><td>minor loss of function, misspelled word, or other
> problem
> ! where an easy workaround is present </td></tr>
> <tr><th>Enhancement</th><td>Request for enhancement</td></tr>
> </table>
memory leaks (Plural)?
"function" -> "functionality" ?(big?)
"is present" -> "exists"?
Neither of us is a native speaker, so take with a grain of salt. ;-)
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/