This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] h8300.c: Move TARGET_INITIALIZER to the end of the file.

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:25:12 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] h8300.c: Move TARGET_INITIALIZER to the end of the file.
References: <87znkek7pb.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <20030619.003515.05601086.kazu@cs.umass.edu> <87smq6k7cq.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <20030619.010051.102982543.kazu@cs.umass.edu> <87of0uk5ny.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:17:05PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Well, it's a style question.  I kind of like the forward
> declarations.  I'm not going to stop you removing them, but
> it seems to me we should have a consistent style.

Based on the fact that we get to remove #ifdef'ed declarations,
I'm in favour of removing them.  As you can see from the Alpha port.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] h8300.c: Move TARGET_INITIALIZER to the end of thefile.
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- Re: [patch] h8300.c: Move TARGET_INITIALIZER to the end of thefile.
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [patch] h8300.c: Move TARGET_INITIALIZER to the end of thefile.
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- Re: [patch] h8300.c: Move TARGET_INITIALIZER to the end of thefile.
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [patch] h8300.c: Move TARGET_INITIALIZER to the end of thefile.
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- Re: [patch] h8300.c: Move TARGET_INITIALIZER to the end of thefile.
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]