This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Update --with-gnu-as doc entry
> In this particular case, we don't have a cross-reference to another
> option. What we have is a case where all of the documentation is
> located someplace else. In this case, a @uref seems clearly better than
> @option, because otherwise it is hard to find the documentation you are
> looking for in the html docs.
Hum... "someplace else" is just above in this case.
> I also suspect that this is a case of incomplete conversion, where
> someone (namely jsm) tried to convert @option to @uref to improve the
> appearance of the documentation, but didn't catch all of the cases that
> mattered. We shouldn't be going backwards by removing improvements just
> because they are incomplete.
Agreed. May I turn the following --with-ld into an @uref then, as you
initially suggested?
> Search for --with-gnu-as. It is 2/3 of the way into the file.
Ah! yes, there are actually two such @uref. But they are not in the options
section.
--
Eric Botcazou