This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: target-hook-ize ASM_FILE_START

Hi Zack,

> > With this patch, I found no new regressions on h8300 port.  In fact,
> > the following regressions went away. :-)
> >
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-intconst-1.c (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c (test for excess errors)
> > XPASS: gcc.dg/setjmp-1.c spurious clobbered warning (test for bogus messages, line 16)
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/setjmp-1.c (test for excess errors)
> 
> That should not have happened; can you make sure that it was really my
> patch that did that?

Oops.  That was my mistake.  With your patch, gcc didn't build
completely probably because of tm.texi.  When I applied your patch
without tm.texi, gcc built fine and, and testing yielded exactly the
same set of regressions.

Kazu Hirata
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]