This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes: > Because it includes tree nodes from all languages, it can write duplicate > macro definitions. Since they are identical, it isn't an error, but isn't > a particularly good idea either. This checks. Sounds fine - but did you bootstrap and regression test this patch anywhere? Please state this in your messages, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, SuSE Linux AG, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |