Re: [tree-ssa] Gimplifying Java

[Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>]

Jeff Sturm writes:
 > On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > Is this one right?  I thought the copy-in and out of the temporary was
 > > necessary on some architectures.
 > 
 > I expected these to be equivalent.  There's still a temporary involved.
 > The trouble with the old code is that a VAR_DECL all by itself doesn't
 > appear to be a valid GIMPLE expression and causes some odd looking tree
 > dumps.
 > 
 > If you don't think it's right we can try something else.  I was meaning to
 > ask how C statements-as-expressions are expressed in GIMPLE...

I'll do a few tests.  This is a very delicate part of the compiler and
has broken before!

Andrew.