This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Gimplifying Java

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:25:26 +0100
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Gimplifying Java
References: <1055422897.824.190.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com><Pine.LNX.4.44.0306120918020.20384-100000@ops2.one-point.com>

Jeff Sturm writes:
 > On 12 Jun 2003, Diego Novillo wrote:
 > > Say, now that you got started with java->GIMPLE, care to tackle
 > > bytecode->GIMPLE? ;)
 > 
 > Maybe.  I think Andrew Haley is planning to do some of this.

Woo!  I thought you were going to leave me no work to do!  :-)

 > Getting inlining to work from source->bytecode and back should be a
 > big boost for gcj.  But the bytecode reader may require
 > considerable effort; it doesn't build functions as trees yet
 > either.

I'm intending to do that as part of the Java tree-SSA work.

Andrew.

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Gimplifying Java
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] Gimplifying Java
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]