This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Gimplifying Java
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:07:26 -0600
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Gimplifying Java
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <1055378824.824.129.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>, Diego Novillo w
rites:
>> Most of the conversion is handled in java_simplify_expr, however there are
>> other changes due to certain trees that are not acceptable to gimplify
>> even though they are accepted by the RTL expanders. For example,
>> LOOP_EXPR nodes with trailing empty statements cause an incorrect CFG to
>> be constructed, breaking copy/constant propogation.
>>
>Do you have a test case for this? It sounds vaguely familiar.
No need. See my previous message. I'm working on this since it's blocking
our ability to do things like zap calls to useless const functions.
jeff