This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Add flag to disable dominator optimizations [patch]


On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 22:08, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Would it be possible to control copy prop separately from discarding
> redundant statements?  I don't see how the latter can hurt.
> 
It would be more intrusive because it would be more fine-grained.  It
means adding more short-circuit logic to rewrite_and_optimize_stmt.  I'd
rather avoid that, ATM.

It's not clear whether the switch will survive at all.  If we find that
it really helps PRE, then I will re-implement the logic differently. 
The switch doesn't really hurt copy-prop nor const-prop, it merely
leaves more work for those two separate passes.


Diego.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]