This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR target/10775

Hello Richard.

Thank you for your advice.

> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 12:20:01PM +0900, Kazuhiro Inaoka wrote:
> > +   if (current_function_is_leaf && (new_reg == RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM))
> > +     return 0;
>
> You failed to remove this part ...
>
> > + (define_insn "return_internal"
> > +   [(return)
> > +    (use (reg:SI 14))]
>
> ... because you failed to actually use this part.
> You need to change the epilogue generation code to match.
> Also, this should be used in place of the existing return
> pattern, not alongside of.

It seems that m32r's epilogue generation code is ignore return pattern from
the first.
It uses only TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_EPILOGUE (m32r_output_function_epilogue).
Is it a problem of how to generate the epilogue code?

Regards,

Kazuhiro
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]