Re: [applied] C++ patch to fix arrays of vectors

[Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>]

> > Please revise this to check for 
> >
> >   CLASS_TYPE_P (type) || TREE_CODE (type) == VECTOR_TYPE
> >
> > We shouldn't be going into that code for an array type.
> 
> What about a compound literal of array type (is there such a thing)?  If
> the CONSTRUCTOR has the right type, we've already massaged it
> appropriately.  Though I suppose can_convert_arg would never return true,
> as it does array-to-pointer conversion on the arg before checking for type
> identity.

Right.  That's why I don't think it makes sense to push ARRAY_TYPEs into
can_convert_arg -- it's just going to waste time.

If want to support compound literals of array type, we should probably
have a separate check for that in reshape_init.

My two cents,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com