This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Small change to expand_expr CONSTRUCTOR handling


kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes:

>     Try a make before you decide you're done.
> 
> It'd work: I have both patches in my tree, and tested them both, but didn't
> get a chance to check in the second one yesterday since it's large.

The commit rules specifically prohibit this to prevent exactly the
sort of problem which we're seeing.  From
<http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#testing>:

> In all cases you must test exactly the change that you intend to
> submit; it's not good enough to test an earlier variant. The tree
> where you perform this test should not have any other changes
> applied to it, because otherwise you cannot be sure that your patch
> will work correctly on its own. Include all your new test cases in
> your testsuite run.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]