This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Eliminate unnecessary gimplifications


In message <1053701737.6937.109.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>, Diego Novillo 
writes:
 >On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 10:26, law@redhat.com wrote:
 >
 >>   is_simple_stmt -- this is the mother of all bogus predicates.  It always
 >>   returns 1.  I haven't tried to fix this one yet.
 >> 
 >is_simple_stmt used to do a lot more.  It would recurse into the
 >statement making sure everything was in SIMPLE form.  Again, Jason will
 >have details :)
Yea, my biggest concern with diving into the nodes in is_simple_stmt
would be that it could be rather expensive.

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]