This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Document Sparc64 configuration
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 09:24:08PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Besides, given that all of config.sub, gcc, gdb and ld still allow for the
> sparcv9 form, it would create even more confusion to obsolete that name in
> gcc only. If we really wanted to do this (which I still consider
> inappropriate for Solaris 2), this should be done consistently all over the
I agree about doing it everywhere. But I also think sparcv9 is
confusing. Does it really mean 64-bit or does it mean 32-bit
(aka v8plus, which is a stupid name).