This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New lang hook: ok_for_sibcall

On 21-May-2003, Andrew Haley <> wrote:
> Fergus Henderson writes:
>  > On 21-May-2003, Andrew Haley <> wrote:
>  > > Sibcalls break Java programs in interesting ways.  To fix this while
>  > > still allowing sibcalls to be used where it won't hurt, I need to be
>  > > able to control when a sibcall is allowed.
>  > 
>  > What about sibcalls via function pointers?
>  > For those, fndecl in expand_call() will be a null pointer.
>  > Your patch doesn't seem to handle that case.
> It doesn't need to.  The test 'fndecl == NULL_TREE' is before the call
> to ok_for_sibcall.

Which test `fndecl == NULL_TREE'?   Specifically, which source file,
revision number, and line number? 

I don't see any such test in calls.c in the current mainline.
I think you may be looking at an old version of calls.c?

Fergus Henderson <>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]