This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Re: target/7434: [x86_64] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1934
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, bangerth at dealii dot org,gbeauchesne at mandrakesoft dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, jh at suse dot cz, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 23:32:35 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: target/7434: [x86_64] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1934
- References: <email@example.com> <20030515104800.GW16629@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20030515223930.GD10321@redhat.com>
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:48:00PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > It seems the following patch has not made it to gcc-patches ever (was
> > apparently just sent to firstname.lastname@example.org),
Sorry for that. Will try to double check to where I am sending the
email. I felt somehow sad that the patch didn't get reviewed, now I see
> > ... though the bug is still present even on the trunk.
> Are you sure? This looks a lot like PR 10673, which I did fix on
> mainline, but was waiting for 3.3 branch to open to apply there.
I also resolved that patch as equivalent to mine and dropped ours from
SuSE tree and didn't noticed new failures.
> > * i386.c (ix86_split_long_move): Fix modes in the precomputed address
> > references.
> As for the patch itself, I prefer the use of replace_equiv_address
> in my patch.
I didn't noticed that function until I read your patch. It definitly is
better choice. I will check what is going on with the testcase
> > * gcc.c-torture/compile/20021008-1.c: New test.
> Please do commit the test case.