This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Mips instruction hazards (part 1/4?)


> > (4) would only be possible for TARGET_EXPLICIT_RELOCS, of course.
> > (3) probably doesn't make much sense when you can't do (4).  So the
> > question is:
> >
> >      - Is it worth doing (3) and (4) at all?  (Hope the answer is yes ;)
> >      - If so, should it be under explicit user control or selected
> >        whenever it seems safe?
> 
> I am not a MIPS expert.  Could you explain why (4) is only possible
> under TARGET_EXPLICIT_RELOCS?

And just to answer this:

Because we still use macro instructions when !explicit relocs.

Richard: I think it's worth it. :)

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]