This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Five unreviewed patches of mine
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 May 2003 11:35:38 -0700
- Subject: Re: Five unreviewed patches of mine
- References: <20030517181733.GA2188@doctormoo>
Nathanael Nerode <email@example.com> writes:
> 1. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/msg01217.html
> (see also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/msg01228.html)
This is OK.
> 2. Ping 2.
I think this will need updating, but it is OK too.
> (also see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg01372.html
> where I revised the ChangeLog)
> See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg02184.html where
> I pinged it and got rather non-specific responses. If it's
> prefered that I don't eliminate the commented-out macro
> definitions (only the comments), fine, I'll try to come up with a
> revised version. (Although I don't think they're all that useful
> in this case anyway...)
> 3. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg01858.html
> This one looks a little confused: only the second hunk is the real
> patch; I got an old version as well for some reason.
Can you send the correct patch?
> 4. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg01554.html
This is OK.
> 5. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg01174.html
I believe that
-installed before GNU CC is built. If the cross compilation header files
-are already suitable for ISO C and GNU CC, nothing special need be
+installed before GCC is built. If the cross compilation header files
+are already suitable for ISO C and GNU C, nothing special need be
should actually just say 'already suitable for GCC'. In particular,
there are some fixes which are only for C++.=
With that change, this is OK.
- Geoffrey Keating <firstname.lastname@example.org>