This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [CFT] kill darwin encode_section_info, rev 3


On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 06:19:12AM +0200, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> Bootstrap completed for c,c++. Test results do not look good.
> Compared with the results from regress (geoff's tester) the failures 
> seem related to the patch. Though not 100% sure.

Gah, this sucks.  I don't think there's much I can do.

From

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-05/msg00938.html

I see the following that appear to be regressions.

  FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution,  -O0 
  FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution,  -O1 
  FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-17.c execution,  -Os 

If I diff assembly before and after, I get either NO changes,
at all with optimization or only trivial changes (register
numbers) without optimization.

If there are REAL failures before and after, someone will 
have to debug the problem and tell me what it is.

  /usr/bin/ld: /var/tmp//cchF7GU3.o malformed object (bad indirect symbol
  table entry (10) (symbol at index 0 is not external)
  collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
  FAIL: gcc.dg/20020201-1.c (test for excess errors)

Again, no differences.

  FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c compilation,  -O0  -fprofile-arcs

I suspect all the bprob failures are Nathan's fault and have
since been fixed.



r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]