This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: TOPLEVEL PATCH: accept more x86 variants
> If they do make such a set where 0-9 are not consecutive, such a character
> set is not suitable for an implementation of ISO C which requires the
> digits to be consecutive in both the source and execution character sets,
> and we now require a C90 compiler on the host; it would be a very strange
> host with such a property but for the shell only, not the compiler.
My point was that I don't want someone seeing this:
and assuming that this was also allowed:
because *that* will fail in obscure ways (EBCDIC, locales).