This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFA] Kill artificial inlining limit
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Cc: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>,"gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 13 May 2003 11:38:59 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Kill artificial inlining limit
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <Pine.LNX.email@example.com. de> <1052837366.5076.50.camel@steven>
On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 10:49, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> I haven't looked at tree-ssa for some time now ("cvs up" always times
Daily snapshots are available at:
> but I suppose we could rearrange things such that the count is
> done after the tree optimizers are finished, with obvious benefits.
Yes, we could do that. In some cases we are inlining some functions
after they are optimized. It all depends in the order in which
finish_function is called. We always call the tree optimizers after all
the calls in the current function have been inlined.