This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: Avoid -Werror bootstrap failure with BUILD_CC=gcc-2.95

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 13:50:38 -0700
Subject: Re: RFA: Avoid -Werror bootstrap failure with BUILD_CC=gcc-2.95
References: <20030511132711.GA15619@daikokuya.co.uk><87ptmp9rl8.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><20030511200831.GE15619@daikokuya.co.uk>

Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> writes:

> Zack Weinberg wrote:-
>
>> Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> writes:
>> 
>> > GCC 2.95 warns here; GCC 3.4 is smarter.  OK?
>> 
>> This is fine as a defensive move, go ahead and check it in, but could
>> you please try to figure out why BUILD_CC isn't getting overridden in
>> stage 2 of a bootstrap?
>
> Well, that's easy.  The question is, do we want BUILD_CC == CC?

You had to go and ask that.  Now I am not sure.

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: Avoid -Werror bootstrap failure with BUILD_CC=gcc-2.95
  - From: Neil Booth

References:
- RFA: Avoid -Werror bootstrap failure with BUILD_CC=gcc-2.95
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: RFA: Avoid -Werror bootstrap failure with BUILD_CC=gcc-2.95
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFA: Avoid -Werror bootstrap failure with BUILD_CC=gcc-2.95
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]