This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: g++.dg/other/stdarg1.C: int vs long


DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:

|> > > !   foo (0, 1, 2, (long)3);
|> > 
|> > I'd kinda prefer 3L, but I guess it doesn't matter.
|> 
|> I thought about that too, but I wasn't sure which one would be more
|> likely to do the right thing with promotion rules in odd situations.

3L and (long)3 are identical (except the latter is not a literal), and
integer promotion is only relevant for char and short.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]