This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
- Cc: zack at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 10:56:31 -0400
- Subject: Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
- References: <10305101227.AA22316@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 08:27:18AM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> > I'm sure it appears to work. That doesn't make it correct. In any
> > case, in my capacity as the VxWorks configury maintainer, I don't
> > want this code in the FSF tree until it's rewritten. Are you going
> > to back out the patch?
> >
> > I want to give Olivier some time to comment before we do anything.
>
> He can do that whether or not the patch is in the FSF tree. Take it
> out now, please.
>
> I don't appreciate your tone here.
>
> Both of us have blanket write privileges and can't order the other around.
>
> Fundamentally, if we disagree on a patch and can't come to some
> agreement, the SC resolves the dispute.
Between two global write maintainers I'd agree with your conclusion.
However, this is an area of the compiler with a (two) specific
maintainers, and Zack was speaking as the specific maintainer of the
part of the compiler you changed.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer