This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: g++.dg/other/stdarg1.C: int vs long

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: rth at redhat dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 20:30:03 -0400
Subject: Re: g++.dg/other/stdarg1.C: int vs long
References: <200305092352.h49NqZm23630@greed.delorie.com> <20030510001455.GP23973@redhat.com>

> > !   foo (0, 1, 2, (long)3);
> 
> I'd kinda prefer 3L, but I guess it doesn't matter.

I thought about that too, but I wasn't sure which one would be more
likely to do the right thing with promotion rules in odd situations.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: g++.dg/other/stdarg1.C: int vs long
  - From: Andreas Schwab

References:
- g++.dg/other/stdarg1.C: int vs long
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: g++.dg/other/stdarg1.C: int vs long
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]