This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/8485: Misc INTEGER*8 fixes
- From: Roger Sayle <roger at www dot eyesopen dot com>
- To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:43:20 -0600 (MDT)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/8485: Misc INTEGER*8 fixes
> Yeah, the support for all this *4, *8 stuff is really "incomplete" as
> the manual states. Thanks for finding and fixing some of the holes !
Are there any other missing pieces of integer*8 support that you're
aware of? Now that all of the target hooks have been implemented, and
we've fixed some more bugs in the front-end proper, is 64-bit integer
support now complete? If so, we could remove the "incomplete" wording
from the g77 manual, and ask people to submit GNATS problem reports should
they encounter additional integer*8 problems, i.e. real bugs.
> > Ok for mainline?
> It's OK with me for mainline (testcase also). I tried to test it on
> alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu, but mainline doesn't build on that platform
Many thanks. Committed to mainline and closed the PR.
I waited until the compilers were building again on the alpha to confirm
that the patch works fine on 64-bit platforms. I bootstrapped c and f77
on alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 and ran the g77 testsuite with "make check-f77"
with no new regressions.