This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Refine check for using bitfield instructions


On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 02:02:28PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> Unfortunately, I can't find what the test case for this was: it was
> part of other changes that I split off.
> 
> Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
> 
> Mon Jun 17 16:02:24 2002  Olivier Hainque  <hainque@act-europe.fr>
> 
>         * expr.c (expand_expr, case BIT_FIELD_REF): Refine the test forcing
>         usage of bitfield instructions for mode1 != BLKmode, only ignoring
>         SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS if the field is not byte aligned. 
>         (store_field): Likewise.

Looks like the fix I was using for the breakage you introduced with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg01263.html

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]