This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] add __amd64__ predefined symbols
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,David O'Brien <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 15:00:06 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] add __amd64__ predefined symbols
- References: <20030426193937.GA11156@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030426194206.GA15983@gee.suse.de> <20030426221556.GA4792@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20030501181032.GF31113@redhat.com> <20030501185206.GQ30033@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Jan Hubicka <email@example.com> writes:
> >> On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 12:15:56AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> > > > builtin_assert ("machine=x86_64"); \
> >> ...
> >> > The naming change is bit problematic. We still have only one choice to
> >> > define for "machine" ...
> >> Um, no, assertions are pair associations, not assignments.
> >> You can have more than one.
> > As Zack mentioned the assertions are obsoletted now, so Andreas is
> > testing whether removing the assertion breaks something. Would that be
> > OK for you? (done for both 3.3.1 and mainline)
> I didn't notice directly any problems, so it seems to be fine,
OK, I will remove the assertion in mainline today and 3.3 once Mark
unfreezes the tree.
> Andreas Jaeger
> SuSE Labs firstname.lastname@example.org
> private email@example.com